See, verify and automate label formats from different marketplaces in one place.
An e-commerce operation usually works with several marketplaces and several carriers. Each channel produces its own label format; a template that prints cleanly on one channel overflows on another, fields overlap or the barcode is clipped. The problem is spotted at the packing table as the order goes out: the label is reprinted, the box is reopened, the shipment is delayed.
Wherever the ZPL comes from, it is rendered by the same engine; you don't have to set up a separate test rig per channel.
When a marketplace updates its template, see the difference before it reaches production.
Get the text and barcode fields of the label as JSON with their coordinates; verify in code that the order number is in the right field.
Produce the labels in your return flow from the same endpoint; they can be sent to the customer as a PDF.
This image was produced from the ZPL beside it with the Labelixa engine.
Try your own ZPL code →^XA
^FO25,20^A0N,28,26^FDORDER LABEL^FS
^FO25,58^A0N,20,18^FDOrder No: US-2026-004871^FS
^FO25,84^A0N,20,18^FDChannel: Marketplace^FS
^BY2,3,70^FO25,115^BCN,70,Y,N,N^FD2026004871^FS
^FO25,215^A0N,20,18^FDITEM: Wireless Earbuds^FS
^FO25,241^A0N,20,18^FDQTY: 2^FS
^FO330,115^BQN,2,5^FDQA,https://labelixa.com^FS
^XZOrder and shipment number
SYMBOLOGYEAN-13Product barcode, marketplace matching
SYMBOLOGYQR CodeOrder tracking link, return flow
Yes. The label is rendered as-is; the goal is to verify the channel's output, not to replace it.
Yes — no plan adds a watermark to the output; the free plan also returns clean PNG/PDF.
Our barcodes are read back with an independent decoder after generation and verified to match the data exactly; 'looking right' is not considered enough.